Reflections on enhancing accountability in the peer-review process.
- UNCG Author/Contributor (non-UNCG co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
- Mark Fine, Professor and Chair (Creator)
- Institution
- The University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG )
- Web Site: http://library.uncg.edu/
Abstract: Having served as an editor of a peer-reviewed journal ( Family Relations) over the last four years, I read Epstein's (October 1995) comment with great interest. Among a number of thought-provoking suggestions, he recommended that two changes should immediately be made in the editorial review process: (a) Reviewers should sign their reviews, and (b) authors should be provided with the opportunity to evaluate the quality of each of the reviews on their manuscript. Although I disagree with the first recommendation, I agree in principle with the second.
Reflections on enhancing accountability in the peer-review process.
PDF (Portable Document Format)
24 KB
Created on 3/7/2013
Views: 2774
Additional Information
- Publication
- Language: English
- Date: 1996
- Keywords
- psychology, peer-review process, accountability, publishing