An investigation of the comparability and accuracy of three differential item functioning (dif) detection methods using empirical and simulated data
- UNCG Author/Contributor (non-UNCG co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
- Ann Elizabeth Harman (Creator)
- Institution
- The University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG )
- Web Site: http://library.uncg.edu/
- Advisor
- Lloyd Bond
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the comparability and accuracy of three differential item functioning (DIF) detection methods: the Mantel-Haenszel X2 approach, the IRT Unsigned Area approach, and the log-linear approach. Based on a review of the professional literature relevant to methodologies used for the detection of differentially functioning test items, two research questions were developed. The first research question addressed the comparability of the DIF indices derived using the three DIF detection methods cited above. The second research question addressed the accuracy of these three DIF detection methods. To investigate these research questions, both empirical and simulated test data were used.
An investigation of the comparability and accuracy of three differential item functioning (dif) detection methods using empirical and simulated data
PDF (Portable Document Format)
5204 KB
Created on 1/1/1995
Views: 165
Additional Information
- Publication
- Dissertation
- Language: English
- Date: 1995
- Subjects
- Test bias $v Statistics
- Psychological tests $x Validity