Browse All

Theses & Dissertations

Submissions

The NIH Mandate One Year On: How Are Libraries Responding?

ECU Author/Contributor (non-ECU co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
William Joseph Thomas, Head of Collection Development (Creator)
Institution
East Carolina University (ECU )
Web Site: http://www.ecu.edu/lib/

Abstract: About one year ago, the landmark National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy began requiring authors who receive NIH funding to deposit final versions of their accepted manuscripts to NIH’s PubMed Central database. These papers would then become freely available to the public no later than 12 months after publication. How are academic libraries responding? Results of a survey will be complemented by interviews with selected librarians to provide insights into who’s doing what, and how successful these libraries feel they have been.

Additional Information

Publication
North American Serials Interest Group. Asheville, NC.
Language: English
Date: 2009
Keywords
Open Access, NIH Mandate, National Institutes of Health, Public Access Policy

This item references:

TitleLocation & LinkType of Relationship
The NIH Mandate One Year On: How Are Libraries Responding?http://thescholarship.ecu.edu/bitstream/handle/10342/2241/NASIGPPT.pdfThe described resource references, cites, or otherwise points to the related resource.