A Pragmatic Attempt to Undermine the Evil-God Challenge

ECU Author/Contributor (non-ECU co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
Zachary Thomas Roupe (Creator)
Institution
East Carolina University (ECU )
Web Site: http://www.ecu.edu/lib/

Abstract: In my project, I propose that pragmatic reasoning for believing in a good god does not fall prey to the Evil God challenge. The “Evil God challenge” is a philosophical argument that holds that the belief in favor of a supremely good god can be equally mirrored or parodied for the existence of a supremely evil god. The challenge does this by providing evidence and counter arguments for why an evil god is just as plausible as a good god. I contend that while the Evil God Challenge holds strong in its epistemic reasoning based approach, a pragmatic reasoning based approach will not allow the EGC challenge the same success.

Additional Information

Publication
Thesis
Language: English
Date: 2023
Subjects
philosophy of religion, evil-god challenge, pascal's wager

Email this document to

This item references:

TitleLocation & LinkType of Relationship
A Pragmatic Attempt to Undermine the Evil-God Challengehttp://hdl.handle.net/10342/9218The described resource references, cites, or otherwise points to the related resource.