A META-ANALYSIS ON THE MULTIFACTOR LEADERSHIP QUESTIONNAIRE (MLQ)
- ECU Author/Contributor (non-ECU co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
- Sara Ridder (Creator)
- Institution
- East Carolina University (ECU )
- Web Site: http://www.ecu.edu/lib/
Abstract: The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) is one of the most commonly used measures for evaluating a subordinate's perceptions of his/her supervisor's transformational , transactional , and passive leadership behaviors (Avolio , 1995; Bass , 1998; 1997; Bass and Avolio , 1995; Dumdum , Lowe , Avolio , 2002; Lowe , Kroeck , and Sivasubramaniam , 1996). Since its original development (Bass , 1985) , the MLQ has been regularly used in organizational research , appearing in over 6 , 000 publications. Although there have been several previously conducted meta-analyses on the MLQ (Leong and Fischer , 2011; Ilies , Nahrgang , and Morgeson , 2007; Harms and Credeʹ , 2010; Kuopplala , 2008) , it has been almost 10 years since the last review. Subsequently , the present study sought to update the literature with a novel meta-analysis of the relevant research studies that have been published during the past ten years. Specifically , this study examined the relationship between the MLQ and critical organizational variables such as leadership effectiveness , job satisfaction , organizational commitment , and organizational citizenship. Overall , for followers of transformational leadership was positively related to organizational citizenship behaviors , leadership effectiveness , job satisfaction and organizational commitment whereas , for followers of transactional leadership the results were mixed with the organizational outcomes.
Additional Information
- Publication
- Thesis
- Language: English
- Date: 2016
- Keywords
- Multifactor leadership questionnaire, Behavior, Transactional leadership
- Subjects
Title | Location & Link | Type of Relationship |
A META-ANALYSIS ON THE MULTIFACTOR LEADERSHIP QUESTIONNAIRE (MLQ) | http://hdl.handle.net/10342/6070 | The described resource references, cites, or otherwise points to the related resource. |