Assessment of the quality of existing patient educational tools focused on sudden cardiac arrest: a systematic evaluation by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Thought Leadership Alliance

ECU Author/Contributor (non-ECU co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)

Sana M Al-Khatib (Creator)

Susan M Campbell (Creator)

Gregg C Fonarow (Creator)

David Hayes (Creator)

Garrett Hazelton (Creator)

Eric D Peterson (Creator)

Gillian D Sanders (Creator)

Samuel Sears (Creator)

Kevin L Thomas (Creator)

Clyde Yancy (Creator)

Institution

East Carolina University (ECU )

Web Site: http://www.ecu.edu/lib/

Abstract: Background Conveying contemporary treatment options for those at risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is challenging. The purpose of the present research was to evaluate the quality and usability of available patient educational tools relevant to SCA and its treatment options, such as implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We hypothesized that this review would identify gaps in areas of information for the enhancement of patient education and decision-making materials. Methods We used a formal instrument to assess specific domains of content, development, and effectiveness of 18 available SCA and ICD educational tools. The multidisciplinary review panel included two electrophysiologists, two general cardiologists, a cardiac psychologist, a health services researcher, and a patient advocate. Results Of the 18 education tools, four were rated as “good, may need revisions, but sufficient for use”, 12 were rated as “marginal, needs revision prior to use”, and two were rated as “poor, inadequate for use”. None of the tools were rated as being of “very good” or “excellent” quality. Conclusion There appear to be opportunities to improve the quality and completeness of existing educational tools for patients with SCA and ICD. While many tools have been developed, they fall below current standards for supporting informed medical decision-making.

Additional Information

Publication

Other

Patient preference and adherence; 7: p. 361-368

Language: English

Date: 2013

Keywords

decision-making, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, patient-centered outcomes research

Email this document to