Variations in Strategic Philosophy among American and Mexican Managers
- UNCP Author/Contributor (non-UNCP co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
- Dr. John Parnell, Belk Chair of Management (Creator)
- Institution
- The University of North Carolina at Pembroke (UNCP )
- Web Site: http://www.uncp.edu/academics/library
Abstract: Strategic managers today are faced with five critical judgment calls when formulating strategies for their companies: (1) Approaching strategy as an art or as a science, (2) publicizing the strategy or maintaining its secrecy, (3) seeking strategic consistency over the long term or maintaining flexibility, (4) embracing strategic risk or avoiding it, and (5) adopting a top-down or a bottom-up approach to strategic planning. This paper compares American and Mexican managers along these five areas. Findings suggest that conventional wisdom on differences between American and Mexican managers in strategy formulation may not be true. Future research directions are also provided.
Variations in Strategic Philosophy among American and Mexican Managers
PDF (Portable Document Format)
79 KB
Created on 1/1/2010
Views: 5109
Additional Information
- Publication
- Journal of Business Ethics, 50(3)
- Language: English
- Date: 2004
- Keywords
- Strategic Planning, Decision Making, Management, Business Planning, Executives, Industrial Management, Organizational Sociology, Risk Management