Command and Initiative in North Africa: Patton VS. Fredendall, and the Battle of Kasserine Pass

ECU Author/Contributor (non-ECU co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
Jessica Marie (Timmerman) Kunert (Creator)
Institution
East Carolina University (ECU )
Web Site: http://www.ecu.edu/lib/

Abstract: This thesis will compare and contrast General George S. Patton, Jr. and General Lloyd R. Fredendall throughout their service during the North African Campaign to argue that, had Patton commanded at Kasserine Pass, the battle would have ended as an American victory. Using Martin Blumenson's edited version of the Patton Papers, this study will pull examples from Patton's experience as a leader to decipher the possibilities of his command at Kasserine Pass. Three overall ideas will be covered: Patton's command style, Fredendall's leadership and failure at Kasserine Pass, and the consequences of General Dwight D. Eisenhower's decisions as supreme commander. The analysis of these points will enforce the theory that, had Patton commanded at Kasserine Pass, the outcome would have been a victory instead of a failure.

Additional Information

Publication
Thesis
Language: English
Date: 2023

Email this document to

This item references:

TitleLocation & LinkType of Relationship
Command and Initiative in North Africa: Patton VS. Fredendall, and the Battle of Kasserine Passhttp://hdl.handle.net/10342/5318The described resource references, cites, or otherwise points to the related resource.