A Response to David Rutledge

UNCP Author/Contributor (non-UNCP co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
Dr. David H. Nikkel, Professor of Religion & Department Chair (Creator)
The University of North Carolina at Pembroke (UNCP )
Web Site: http://www.uncp.edu/academics/library

Abstract: This appreciative response to David Rutledge’s review of my book, Radical Embodiment, deals with the nature of categorization/generalization with respect to and in light of postmodernism, with the issue of the articulation of tacit knowledge, with Mark C. Taylor’s current a/theological stance regarding the concept of God, and finally with my model of divine embodiment that rejects special providence and revelation.

Additional Information

Tradition & Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 37:2
Language: English
Date: 2010
articulation, God, determinism/predestination, embodiment, finitude, indeterminate freedom, general and special providence, panentheism, postmodernism, quantum events, tacit knowledge, tradition, Peacocke, Arthur, Schleiermacher, Friedrich, Taylor, Mark C., Yu, Zhenhua

Email this document to