Is it testimony or trait? Understanding children’s preferences for informants

UNCG Author/Contributor (non-UNCG co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
Rachel C. Croce (Creator)
Institution
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG )
Web Site: http://library.uncg.edu/
Advisor
Janet Boseovski

Abstract: Children show a positivity bias in social learning such that they prefer to learn from those who are nice (over those who are mean; e.g., Lane, Wellman, & Gelman, 2013) and those who provide positive content in their speech (over negative content; Boseovski, 2012). The present study investigated the way that these biases function when children practice epistemic vigilance. Children heard stories about different informants who varied in both testimony (i.e., judgments that a painting was good or bad) and traits (i.e., nice or mean). Children were asked who they would endorse, who they would ask about a future painting, and their affiliation preferences. Children chose to endorse and ask the mean informant who provided positive testimony, but chose to affiliate with the nice informant who provided negative testimony. Endorsements of positive testimony increased with age. This study extends research on children’s epistemic vigilance to indicate the biases children have for positive testimony when they selectively learn from others. The findings may help to inform teachers and caregivers about ways to establish more effective learning and social experiences.

Additional Information

Publication
Thesis
Language: English
Date: 2019
Keywords
Child Psychology, Cognition in Children, Developmental Psychology, Developmental Social Cognition, Selective Learning in Children, Social Perception in Children
Subjects
Child psychology
Developmental psychology
Social perception in children
Cognition in children
Social learning

Email this document to