Assessment of Modular Construction Utilization Across All Campuses of the University of North Carolina System

ASU Author/Contributor (non-ASU co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
Scott Hopkins (Creator)
Institution
Appalachian State University (ASU )
Web Site: https://library.appstate.edu/

Abstract: Modular building construction can benefit a project by reducing construction time, delivering a consistently high-quality product, and potentially saving the owner money. Modular works best for structures with many repetitive elements; for this reason, university dorms are prime candidates for modularization. Through a University of North Carolina (UNC)-wide survey and interviews with UNC decision makers this research shows that most UNC campuses have neither used nor considered this. Campuses that have not used, or that have not considered using, modular construction cite concerns about quality, conflicts with the existing campus standards, and questions about whether modular is acceptable to the NC State Construction Office standards as reasons for not pursuing modular. Mountaineer Hall is the only modular project and it was a positive experience for Appalachian State University (ASU). This research includes a case study comparing Mountaineer Hall and Summit Hall, both at ASU that illustrates potential advantages of modular. Construction on both residence halls began in 2010. Mountaineer Hall is a 118,434 square feet, 460-bed facility that cost $16,500,000 and was built in less than one year. Summit Hall is a 106,820 square feet, 333-bed facility that cost $31,000,000 and was built in two years.

Additional Information

Publication
Thesis
Hopkins, S. (2014). Assessment of Modular Construction Utilization Across All Campuses of the University of North Carolina System. Unpublished master’s thesis. Appalachian State University, Boone, NC.
Language: English
Date: 2014
Keywords
Modular Construction, Prefabrication, Summit Hall, Mountaineer Hall, BIM

Email this document to