How Functorial Are (Deep) GADTs?
- ASU Author/Contributor (non-ASU co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
- Patricia Johann Ph.D, Professor (Creator)
- Institution
- Appalachian State University (ASU )
- Web Site: https://library.appstate.edu/
Abstract: It is well-known that GADTs do not admit standard map functions of the kind supported by ADTs and nested types. In addition, standard map functions are insufficient to distribute their data-changing argument functions over all of the structure present in elements of deep GADTs, even just deep ADTs or nested types. This paper develops an algorithm for detecting exactly which functions are mappable over data whose types are (deep) GADTs. The algorithm takes as input a term t whose type is an instance of a deep GADT D and a function f to be mapped over t. It detects a minimal possible shape of t as an element of D, and returns a minimal set of constraints f must satisfy to be mappable over t. The crux of the algorithm is its ability to separate t's essential structure as an element of D -- i.e., the part of t that is essential for it to have the shape of an element of D -- from its incidental structure as an element of D -- i.e., the part of t that is simply data in the positions of this shape. The algorithm ensures that the constraints on f come only from t's essential structure. This work is part of an ongoing effort to define initial algebra semantics for GADTs that properly generalizes the usual semantics for ADTs and nested types as least fix points of higher-order endofunctors.
How Functorial Are (Deep) GADTs?
PDF (Portable Document Format)
328 KB
Created on 10/4/2022
Views: 68
Additional Information
- Publication
- Johann P. & Cagne P. How Functorial Are (Deep) GADTs? 2022. Publisher version of record available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.14891.pdf
- Language: English
- Date: 2022
- Keywords
- computer science, GADTs, nested types, ADTs