Rebuttal to Lundberg’s response paper

UNCG Author/Contributor (non-UNCG co-authors, if there are any, appear on document)
Justin Harmon, Assistant Professor (Creator)
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG )
Web Site:

Abstract: Lundberg (2018, this issue) provides a thoughtful rejoinder to the article, “Leisure is for Experience, Not Industry” (this issue), one that was surely intended to add clarity and support for the experience industry model of Pine and Gilmore (2011) as it relates to the broad field of leisure studies. However, Lundberg’s response evidenced several issues that remain to be addressed, much as does the experience complex writ large.

Additional Information

. Scholé: A Journal of Leisure Studies & Recreation Education, 33(2), 66-69. doi: 10.1080/1937156X.2018.1513274
Language: English
Date: 2018
leisure, experience, experience industry

Email this document to